BPM Enterprise Homepage



BLOGGERS
 
Nari Kannan [51]  RSS  Nari Kannan's Biography
Ismael Ghalimi [23]  RSS  Ismael Ghalimi's Biography
Jeffrey Mills [21]  RSS  Jeffrey Mills's Biography
Jim Sinur [20]  RSS  Jim Sinur's Biography
Louis DiToro [15]  RSS  Louis DiToro's Biography
Kiran Garimella [12]  RSS  Kiran Garimella's Biography
Vinayak Khadye [9]  RSS  Vinayak Khadye's Biography
Carlos Accioly [7]  RSS  Carlos Accioly's Biography
Bruce Silver [6]  RSS  Bruce Silver's Biography
Russ Stalters [6]  RSS  Russ Stalters's Biography
Samah Ghanem [6]  RSS  Samah Ghanem's Biography
Sandy Kemsley [4]  RSS  Sandy Kemsley's Biography
John T. Wilson [3]  RSS  John T. Wilson's Biography


CATEGORIES
 
BPM [106]  RSS
Companies [58]  RSS
Conference [2]  RSS
General [186]  RSS
People [29]  RSS
Research [54]  RSS
SOA [9]  RSS
The Buzz [20]  RSS
Vendors [31]  RSS


RECENT ENTRIES RSS
 


BLOG ARCHIVE RSS
 



LATEST COMMENTS
 
ITIL and BPM
by : Sanjay V.
QCT Trade-offs
by : Haytham Zeidan
 


 Ad Links
 
Process Management Training Slides
 

17 January 2008 by Nari Kannan
Printable version  |  Email to a friend

Process Improvement? Dont Throw People at the Problem!

The Associated Press reported that over 2007 summer, there was a huge surge in applications for U.S. Citizenship. Rep. Charles Schumer of New York pushed for hiring retirees from the Homeland Security Department's Immigration Services Division back to reduce the backlog.

This is a classic case of throwing people at the problem! Expedient? Sure. Making sure that these new citizens can vote in the 2008 Presidential Elections? Sure. That may have something to do with it!

Throwing people at the problem is more often done than spoken about! Whether you are shorthanded in a customer service center during peak demand times or you a BPO services vendor who just found out that your client is mad about you not meeting certain Service Levels (SLAs), throwing people at the problem is what is done, nine times out of ten!

Never works in the long run! Just costs more money, resources, all wasted! I can at least understand that while throwing people at the problem, a parallel intensive study is started to see ways of simplifying and improving the process. Most often, not!

C.K.Prahlad, the management guru called this "Paving The Cow Path". One cow starts walking across the meadow meandering through the grass, the second one follows, people take this for a hiking trail, and pretty soon there is a lot of traffic. Mistaking this for the best way a road can be laid across this land, paving it would be the "paving the cow path".

Processes are very similar. I bet that if someone took a closer look at the Immigration Application Processing, they can find a hundred, outdated, wasteful steps involved. They were most likely designed 20, 30 years ago. New technologies may have come along making many of the steps easier to do or unncessary, duplicative or simply too wasteful. There may be bottlenecks in the processing pipeline that are holding up applications while other parts of the process have excess capacity.

This is where before throwing people at the problem, it may be worthwhile to see if we are paving the cow path or laying a more direct, shorter and more efficient, effective route to the destination.

Nowhere is throwing more people at the problem worse, than in Software Development. Many senior managers have the wrong idea that if 10 engineers can get some software done in 10 days, 100 software engineers can get it done in 1 day! Throwing more people in software development only increases the span of communication among stakeholders and things get progressively worse!

When a task cannot be partitioned because of sequential constraints, the application of more effort has no effect on the schedule. The bearing of a child takes nine months, no matter how many women are assigned. - Frederick Brooks, The Mythical Man-Month

 
BPM , General , People , Research
posted by Nari Kannan  at  12:59 PM ET | comments [1] | trackbacks [6]


BLOG COMMENT

posted by  HumbleScot 25 January 2008 at 8:40 AM ET
You are correct. First find the problem and then throw resources at it.

The biggest problem is not in the immigration department, its in the background checks. I went through the Immigration department processes in 6 months, but it took two years to get the background checks done.

If thye reduce the immigration process to 3 moths they may suceed in increasing the background check backlog to 3 years. Where is the improvement?
 

ADD COMMENT
(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
 
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote emoticon smiles
 
comment (*) :

max characters : 1500

characters remaining :
remember me :
To help us prevent spam-generated submissions,
please enter the summation of 1 and 1 below: