BPM Enterprise Homepage



BLOGGERS
 
Nari Kannan [56]  RSS  Nari Kannan's Biography
Ismael Ghalimi [23]  RSS  Ismael Ghalimi's Biography
Jeffrey Mills [21]  RSS  Jeffrey Mills's Biography
Jim Sinur [21]  RSS  Jim Sinur's Biography
Louis DiToro [15]  RSS  Louis DiToro's Biography
Kiran Garimella [12]  RSS  Kiran Garimella's Biography
Vinayak Khadye [9]  RSS  Vinayak Khadye's Biography
Carlos Accioly [7]  RSS  Carlos Accioly's Biography
Bruce Silver [6]  RSS  Bruce Silver's Biography
Russ Stalters [6]  RSS  Russ Stalters's Biography
Samah Ghanem [6]  RSS  Samah Ghanem's Biography
Sandy Kemsley [4]  RSS  Sandy Kemsley's Biography
John T. Wilson [4]  RSS  John T. Wilson's Biography


CATEGORIES
 
BPM [113]  RSS
Companies [61]  RSS
Conference [2]  RSS
General [186]  RSS
People [33]  RSS
Research [59]  RSS
SOA [10]  RSS
The Buzz [22]  RSS
Vendors [31]  RSS


RECENT ENTRIES RSS
 


BLOG ARCHIVE RSS
 



LATEST COMMENTS
 
BPM Versus BI
by : Jason
BPM Versus BI
by : Hector
BPM Versus BI
by : Raj Jay
BPM Versus BI
by : James
 


 Ad Links
 
Process Management Training Slides
 

28 February 2007 by Sandy Kemsley
Printable version  |  Email to a friend

Gartner BPM summit Day 3

I had a short day on the final day of Gartner’s BPM conference in San Diego this week, since I had to catch a flight back to Toronto in the afternoon, but I managed to attend the morning sessions.

The morning started with a keynote by Yvonne Genovese of Gartner on changes to expect in enterprise business applications over the next 3-4 years, primarily ERP systems such as SAP and Oracle. Although at first glance, this doesn’t seem to have much to do with BPM, it really has everything to do with BPM: as customers stop accepting the monolithic world view and pre-determined workflows of the business application vendors, they want these systems to expose their functionality as services, then orchestrate the services using BPM. Instead of using the business application directly to do, for example, an order-to-cash process, a more agile and visible order-to-cash process created using BPM will invoke some of the business applcation’s functionality as services, as well as consuming other internal and external services as part of the process.

This isn’t going to be on the business application vendor’s terms any more, either: Gone are the days of the vendor picking a small set of software vendors which which they integrate, and restricting a customer’s options to working only with those products, customers will be able to create their own ecosystem of vendors. They’ll continue to use their large business application vendor for many of the core services, but more like a large toolbox of services rather than a monolithic application; then they’ll pick and choose other services from any vendors that they choose to work with to round out their business processes. And with the processes implemented using a BPMS, all of the related tools come into play, such as modelling, simulation and monitoring. This falls in line completely with the themes that I noted on the previous two days of the conference: the growing importance of both visibility and agiilty in processes.

I spent most of the rest of the morning in sessions about business rules: first, a presentation by a Fair Isaac customer, Discover Financial Services, and then in a panel hosted by Jim Sinur of Gartner with two other end customers discussing their use of complex rules systems. It’s well understood by now that business rules -- or decision management, in the current vernacular -- are a critical part of BPM to help both with automating decisions and suggesting courses of action to a human participant. The focus of these two sessions was more directly on the use of decision management across the organization, both as part of BPM and for other decisioning.

Discover’s case study was particularly interesting, since as a credit card company with 50 million cardholders, there’s a lot of things to make decisions about, and many areas of risk to juggle while doing so. They actually use three different rules engines, then combine the results in different ways depending on the situation. All in all, they’re starting to automate -- and optimize -- decisions in everything from individual purchase approvals to customer contact strategies to portfolio scoring, with the ultimate goal of reducing losses and increasing revenue.

You can read all of my (much less structured) "live blogging" posts from the Gartner BPM summit over on my ebizQ blog.

 
BPM
posted by Sandy Kemsley  at  12:51 PM ET | comments [3] | trackbacks [99]


BLOG COMMENT

posted by  James Taylor  [ http://www.edmblog.com ] 1 March 2007 at 9:49 AM ET
Decision Management is an important concept that companies should consider in parallel with business process management. Discover is a very decision-centric company, so you would expect them to be a leader in this. More and more companies are getting there but still more need to focus on this.
 


posted by  Sandy Kemsley  [ http://www.column2.com ] 1 March 2007 at 10:07 AM ET
James, thanks for the comment. I was really impressed with what Discover is doing, and obviously can't begin to do it justice in a short blog post. It seems like they're still fairly early in their journey, and recognize that they have a long way to go before fully automated decisioning, but are seeing the benefits and setting an example in this area. Great presentation.
 


posted by  James Taylor  [ http://www.edmblog.com ] 1 March 2007 at 1:38 PM ET
Well here is the presentation for anyone who is interested - Discover at Gartner
 

ADD COMMENT
(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
 
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote emoticon smiles
 
comment (*) :

max characters : 1500

characters remaining :
remember me :
To help us prevent spam-generated submissions,
please enter the summation of 1 and 9 below: