BPM Enterprise Homepage



BLOGGERS
 
Nari Kannan [56]  RSS  Nari Kannan's Biography
Ismael Ghalimi [23]  RSS  Ismael Ghalimi's Biography
Jeffrey Mills [21]  RSS  Jeffrey Mills's Biography
Jim Sinur [21]  RSS  Jim Sinur's Biography
Louis DiToro [15]  RSS  Louis DiToro's Biography
Kiran Garimella [12]  RSS  Kiran Garimella's Biography
Vinayak Khadye [9]  RSS  Vinayak Khadye's Biography
Carlos Accioly [7]  RSS  Carlos Accioly's Biography
Bruce Silver [6]  RSS  Bruce Silver's Biography
Russ Stalters [6]  RSS  Russ Stalters's Biography
Samah Ghanem [6]  RSS  Samah Ghanem's Biography
Sandy Kemsley [4]  RSS  Sandy Kemsley's Biography
John T. Wilson [4]  RSS  John T. Wilson's Biography


CATEGORIES
 
BPM [113]  RSS
Companies [61]  RSS
Conference [2]  RSS
General [186]  RSS
People [33]  RSS
Research [59]  RSS
SOA [10]  RSS
The Buzz [22]  RSS
Vendors [31]  RSS


RECENT ENTRIES RSS
 


BLOG ARCHIVE RSS
 



LATEST COMMENTS
 
BPM Versus BI
by : Jason
BPM Versus BI
by : Hector
BPM Versus BI
by : Raj Jay
BPM Versus BI
by : James
 


 Ad Links
 
Process Management Training Slides
 

6 May 2007 by Vinayak Khadye
Printable version  |  Email to a friend

BPM Series: My first brush with IBM's WebSphere Process Modeler

Yesterday I and a couple of colleagues from our BPM team spent some time exploring WebSphere Process Modeler. The purpose of our exploration was to examine the possibility of using WebSphere Process Modeler as a process modeling tool across the organization replacing Visio.

Unfortunately none of us are formally trained to use WS Process Modeler. So, after spending almost about 3 hours we managed to define a simple 5-7 step process representing our New Business Applications process. Here are my initial impressions about WS Process Modeler:

- The most disappointing part of the process modeler is the footprint it occupies on a client machine. It needs at least 1 GB RAM! This will be the biggest obstacle in our attempts to make it as the preferred process modeling tool amongst user community.

- The tool offers 3 views - basic, intermediate and advanced. This is indeed a very good feature. For example, a smart or key user can start with basic view and subsequently the analyst can take over and build the process model further to make it ready for technical development on WebSphere Integration Developer (WID).

- The tool would score low on ease of use or intuitiveness. However, I do not blame IBM for this. WS process modeler is a fairly comprehensive tool addressing very wide range of process modeling and process simulation needs. And hence it is likely to be very complex.

- The feature I liked the most was the on-line error log it provided for users / analyst to fix the process model for syntax or grammar. This is a very useful features for beginners as it provides them help at design time itself to fix the model before deployment.

 
BPM , Vendors
posted by Vinayak Khadye  at  2:01 AM ET | comments [1] | trackbacks [8]


BLOG COMMENT

posted by  Dian Schaffhauser 7 May 2007 at 11:24 AM ET
Vinayak,
Very useful information. Did you feel like knowledge of BPMN, the modeling notation, was essential for using it? Also, did it come with documentation or online help that was useful?
-- Dian S.
 

ADD COMMENT
(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
 
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote emoticon smiles
 
comment (*) :

max characters : 1500

characters remaining :
remember me :
To help us prevent spam-generated submissions,
please enter the summation of 3 and 5 below: