BPM Enterprise Homepage



BLOGGERS
 
Nari Kannan [63]  RSS  Nari Kannan's Biography
Jim Sinur [23]  RSS  Jim Sinur's Biography
Ismael Ghalimi [23]  RSS  Ismael Ghalimi's Biography
Jeffrey Mills [21]  RSS  Jeffrey Mills's Biography
Louis DiToro [15]  RSS  Louis DiToro's Biography
Kiran Garimella [12]  RSS  Kiran Garimella's Biography
Vinayak Khadye [9]  RSS  Vinayak Khadye's Biography
Carlos Accioly [7]  RSS  Carlos Accioly's Biography
Russ Stalters [6]  RSS  Russ Stalters's Biography
Samah Ghanem [6]  RSS  Samah Ghanem's Biography
Bruce Silver [6]  RSS  Bruce Silver's Biography
Sandy Kemsley [4]  RSS  Sandy Kemsley's Biography
John T. Wilson [4]  RSS  John T. Wilson's Biography


CATEGORIES
 
BPM [122]  RSS
Companies [64]  RSS
Conference [3]  RSS
General [188]  RSS
People [35]  RSS
Research [66]  RSS
SOA [12]  RSS
The Buzz [24]  RSS
Vendors [32]  RSS


RECENT ENTRIES RSS
 


BLOG ARCHIVE RSS
 



LATEST COMMENTS
 
 


 Ad Links
 
iSixSigma Live! Save up to $700
Process Management Training Slides
 

20 June 2008 by Nari Kannan
Printable version  |  Email to a friend

Approach to BPM Adoption - Europe Vs The U.S.

Paul Harmon of Business Process Trends writes a very interesting column - BPM in Europe - about the differences he sees between Europe and the US, when it comes to adoption and use of Business Process Management approaches, tools, and techniques.

Paul observes that Europe is probably more advanced in its use of workflow automation software and hence Business Process Management as a disciplined technical approach seems to be more mature there, than in the U.S.

He also observes that among technology consulting firms, use of BPMS tools is more pronounced in Europe than the U.S. He observes that in the U.S, a lot more companies are engaged in Organizational Information Architecture than in Europe.

However, interest in Business Process Management as a priority within companies is equal in the U.S and Europe.

My guess is that use of information technology may have a longer history in the U.S than Europe. Consequently, there are many more islands of systems that do their own thing. Tying them all into a cohesive Business Process Flow Orchestration may involve retrofitting the older IT systems with technologies like Service Oriented Architectures (SOA) before BPMS solutions can be applied to tie them all together in the context of end-to-end business processes. This is where they may be doing a lot of Enterprise Architectural work on the existing Information Systems.

One of the more interesting observations Paul has about U.S companies is that they are more experimental in nature, switching over to new, untried approachees, while Europe may be more deliberative before adoption of new technologies. This is a double edged sword. Unless somebody tries these new approaches out, they may not be able to see the problems with them and fix them! Seems like sometimes US companies may be the guinea pigs for new approaches and technologies.

Interesting set of observations that could help both parties on both sides of the pond!

Our greatest strength as a human race is our ability to acknowledge our differences, our greatest weakness is our failure to embrace them. - Judith Henderson

 
BPM , People , Research
posted by Nari Kannan  at  3:39 PM ET | comments [2] | trackbacks [0]


BLOG COMMENT

posted by  daniel 26 June 2008 at 9:17 AM ET
Very interesting article - the Judith Henderson quote is what I don't like. Maybe I don't understand English very well, but it seems a stupidity. One thing is to say that people are different, another is to force yourself to be be 'them' (embrace, or be weak as a 'human'). This is so obvious that should not even be discussed.

But, like I said, maybe it is about my poor English.
 


posted by  Nari Kannan 26 June 2008 at 10:02 AM ET
Daniel:

Judith Henderson's quote is actually quite nice. It says that it is a good thing to know that there are differences but the good thing is to embrace those differences and take advantage of them. She is not saying that everbody needs to be like somebodyelse but the opposite. Sorry if it offended you although it is not meant to be offensive at all!

Regards
Nari
 

ADD COMMENT
(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
 
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote emoticon smiles
 
comment (*) :

max characters : 1500

characters remaining :
remember me :
To help us prevent spam-generated submissions,
please enter the summation of 1 and 6 below: