<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>BPM Enterprise.com Blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://www.bpmenterprise.com/blog/</link>
		<description>Business Process Management Blogs at the BPMEnterprise.com Blogosphere</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2004-2010www.bpmenterprise.com, CTQ Media</copyright>
		<managingEditor>blogs@bpmenterprise.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>blogs@bpmenterprise.com</webMaster>
		<generator>CTQ Blog 1.0.5</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 06:34:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    	<ttl>60</ttl>

		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BPMN Gaining Traction in BPA Tools]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bpmenterprise.com/blog/blog.asp?bi=1180</link>
			<description><![CDATA[BPMN is the de facto standard for process modeling, but many leading modeling tools, particularly those incorporated within high-end business process analysis (BPA) suites, have so far been reluctant to adopt it. Now that appears to be changing.Recently IDS Scheer announced that ARIS, generally considered the leading standalone BPA suite, ...]]></description>
			
			<author><![CDATA[Bruce Silver]]></author>
			
			<category>
			<![CDATA[General]]>
			</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 14:48:07 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.bpmenterprise.com/blog/blog.asp?bi=1180</guid>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What Makes a BPMS Good?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bpmenterprise.com/blog/blog.asp?bi=1140</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I’m in the process of updating my 2006 BPMS Report series on BPMInstitute.org to the new and improved 2007 version. A major change from last year is a beefed-up evaluation scoring. I’ve discovered that many users (and most vendors) are happy to skip the 25-page walkthrough of the product and ...]]></description>
			
			<author><![CDATA[Bruce Silver]]></author>
			
			<category>
			<![CDATA[BPM&nbsp;,&nbsp;General&nbsp;,&nbsp;Research]]>
			</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:29:06 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.bpmenterprise.com/blog/blog.asp?bi=1140</guid>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BPDM Passes Important Hurdles]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bpmenterprise.com/blog/blog.asp?bi=1139</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just received a note from Phil Gilbert of Lombardi, a key contributor to the BPDM effort in OMG, that says:[I] wanted to let you know that the OMG Architecture Board voted to approve the BPDM spec today. There are actually 2 more small hurdles instead of 1 more as I ...]]></description>
			
			<author><![CDATA[Bruce Silver]]></author>
			
			<category>
			<![CDATA[General]]>
			</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:22:25 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.bpmenterprise.com/blog/blog.asp?bi=1139</guid>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Diagrams, Models, and Metamodels -- Oh My!]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bpmenterprise.com/blog/blog.asp?bi=1137</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My comment on Keith Swenson’s XPDL-BPEL apples-and-oranges post and the failure of XPDL to fill the vacuum left by OMG in the BPMN specification stirred up an interesting response from Keith that reinvigorates the discussion and helps clear the air. But he still frames the discussion in terms of portability ...]]></description>
			
			<author><![CDATA[Bruce Silver]]></author>
			
			<category>
			<![CDATA[BPM]]>
			</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:21:49 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.bpmenterprise.com/blog/blog.asp?bi=1137</guid>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Real Issues with XPDL, BPEL, and BPMN]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bpmenterprise.com/blog/blog.asp?bi=1135</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Keith Swenson is one of the true superheroes of BPM, and a pioneer in the development of interoperability standards. Known for his stalwart defense of XPDL, he periodically feels called upon to insist that XPDL does not compete with BPEL… then usually adding that XPDL is actually better. But I’ve ...]]></description>
			
			<author><![CDATA[Bruce Silver]]></author>
			
			<category>
			<![CDATA[BPM]]>
			</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:22:26 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.bpmenterprise.com/blog/blog.asp?bi=1135</guid>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Be My Guest at Brainstorm BPM]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bpmenterprise.com/blog/blog.asp?bi=1133</link>
			<description><![CDATA[BPMS Watch invites you to join me at BPMInstitute.org’s Business Process Management Conference, April 10-11 at The Drake Hotel in Chicago.As part of my participation in the event, I have secured a limited number of Complimentary 1-Day Conference Passes (a $995 value) for BPMS Watch readers. (Note: this is for ...]]></description>
			
			<author><![CDATA[Bruce Silver]]></author>
			
			<category>
			<![CDATA[General&nbsp;,&nbsp;People]]>
			</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:11:47 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.bpmenterprise.com/blog/blog.asp?bi=1133</guid>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- # include file="include/xmlCounter.asp" -->